1981 P Cr (PLP)
SHAH WALI KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1981 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SHAH WALI KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 P Cr (PLP) (SHAH WALI KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Hanif Niazi for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 426-Sentence, suspension of-Petitioner convicted and sentenced for 5 years' R. I. on charge of attempted murder but his appeal not disposed of although a period of more than one year elapsed since his conviction-Petitioner also filing affidavit of com plainant stating to have compromised with petitioner-Sentence of petitioner suspended, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Shah Wali Khan, the appellant-petitioner, was convicted by the learned Magistrate invested with powers under section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Mianwali, vide his judgment dated the 29th March, 1980, under section 307 of the Pakistan Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years. He has now applied for suspension of his sentence under section 426 of the Code of Criminal Procedure because his appeal has not been disposed of though a period of more than a year has elapsed since his conviction was recorded. He has filed the affidavit of the complainant stating that he has compromised the dispute with the petitioner. In these circumstances the sentence of the petitioner is suspended and he will be released on bail on his furnishing security in the sum of Rs. 10,000 (rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Magistrate. Petition allowed.