1984 PLP 1033(1) (SCMR)
BASHARAT KHAN -Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
| Citation | 1984 PLP 1033(1) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | --Art. 188-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302-Murder-Review --Reappraisal of evidence-Case not found fit for reappraisal of evidence meant to arrive at a different conclusion on questions fact-Review not allowed ---Review by Supreme Court. |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | BASHARAT KHAN -Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 1033(1) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 1033(1) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the --Art. 188-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302-Murder-Review --Reappraisal of evidence-Case not found fit for reappraisal of evidence meant to arrive at a different conclusion on questions fact-Review not allowed ---Review by Supreme Court. bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 1033(1) (SCMR) (BASHARAT KHAN -Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Date of hearing : 11th December, 1983.
- Sh. Zafar Mahmood. Advocate Supreme Court with Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record Petitioner
Headnotes / Summary
(Petition for review of the order dated 25th May, 1983, passed by this our in Criminal petition No. 165-R of 1982). --Art. 188-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302-Murder-Review --Reappraisal of evidence-Case not found fit for reappraisal of evidence meant to arrive at a different conclusion on questions fact-Review not allowed
[Review by Supreme Court]. Sh. Zafar Mahmood. Advocate Supreme Court with Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record Petitioner Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑Art. 188‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302‑Murder‑Review --Reappraisal of evidence‑Case not found fit for reappraisal of evidence meant to arrive at a different conclusion on questions fact‑Review not allowed ‑‑‑[Review by Supreme Court]. Sh. Zafar Mahmood. Advocate Supreme Court with Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record Petitioner Nemo for the State. Date of hearing : 11th December, 1983. ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑This is a Review Petition against tic judgment of this Court dated 25‑5‑1983 in a murder case. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner at length we fin that it is a frivolous petition because the grounds of review themselves show that all that the petitioner's counsel requires this Court to do was merely to reappraise the evidence and to reach a different conclusion on question of fact, to suit him. We have, however, already observed, after going through the impugned judgment in the light of the contentions raised the petitioner's counsel at the time of the hearing of the main petition that this was not a fit case for reappraisal of evidence. This is consequently dismissed. S.Q. Petition dismissed.