1995SCMR1101 (PLP)
Chaudhry LIAQUAT ALI ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN and 3 other‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1995SCMR1101 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, Saiduzzaman Siddiqui and |
| Parties | Chaudhry LIAQUAT ALI ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN and 3 other‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Banking Companies Ordinance (LVII of 1962)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995SCMR1101 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Banking Companies Ordinance (LVII of 1962)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995SCMR1101 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, Saiduzzaman Siddiqui and.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995SCMR1101 (PLP) (Chaudhry LIAQUAT ALI ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN and 3 other‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Usman Ghani Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court assisted by Faizanul Haq, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in both Petitions).
- Date of hearing: 18th October, 1994.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 27‑A‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider inter alia whether for the offences committed in the year 1987 accused could lawfully be charged under S. 27‑A of the Banking Companies Ordinance, 1962, which was added thereto through an amendment made in the year 1990.
Judgment & Decree
Ch. LIAQAT ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner versus STATE OF BANK OF PAKISTAN and 3 others‑‑‑Respondent (On appeal from the order dated 8‑8‑1994 passed by the High Court of Sindh, Karachi in Crl. Original Misc. No. 63/1988). Criminal Petitions for Leave to Appeals Nos. 67/K and 68/K of 1994, decided on 18th October, 1994. ‑‑‑‑S. 27‑A‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider inter alia whether for the offences committed in the year 1987 accused could lawfully be charged under S. 27‑A of the Banking Companies Ordinance, 1962, which was added thereto through an amendment made in the year 1990. Usman Ghani Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court assisted by Faizanul Haq, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in both Petitions). Date of hearing: 18th October, 1994. MUHAMMAD RAFIQ TARAR, J.‑‑‑Leave to appeal is granted to consider inter alia whether for the offences committed in the year 1987 the petitioner could lawfully be charged under section 27‑A of the Banking Companies Ordinance, 1962 which was added thereto through an amendment made in 1990. N.H.Q./L‑80/S Leave granted