Register
SCMR 1998

1998 PLP 114 (SCMR)

BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE through Chairman and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ILYAS MEHMOOD NIZAMI ‑‑‑ Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Civil Petition No. 361‑L of 1997, decided on 2nd April, 1997.
Honorable Judges
Zia Mahmood Mirza, Irshad Hasan Khan and Raja Afrasiab Khan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1998 PLP 114 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Zia Mahmood Mirza, Irshad Hasan Khan and Raja Afrasiab Khan, JJ
Parties BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE through Chairman and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ILYAS MEHMOOD NIZAMI ‑‑‑ Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1998 PLP 114 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1998 PLP 114 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Zia Mahmood Mirza, Irshad Hasan Khan and Raja Afrasiab Khan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1998 PLP 114 (SCMR) (BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE through Chairman and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ILYAS MEHMOOD NIZAMI ‑‑‑ Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Advocate‑on‑Record; for Petitioners.
  • Nemo for Respondent.
  • Date of hearing: 2nd April, 1997
  • Ch. Ejar Ahmed, Advocate Supreme Court with Tanvir Ahmad,
  • Advocate-on-Record; for Petitioners.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the order dated 24‑3‑1997 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in I.C.A. No.3 of 1997 in W.P. No.20809 Of 1996). Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Educational institution‑‑‑High Court summoning examiner alongwith answer books‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Petitioner, Board of Secondary Education, contended that High Court was not right in summoning examiner alongwith answer books‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to examine the contention raised‑‑ Supreme Court meanwhile ordered suspension of impugned order. Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Lahore v. Saima Azad t 49h SCMR 676 rel. Ch. Ejar Ahmed, Advocate Supreme Court with Tanvir Ahmad,

Judgment & Decree

ZIA MAHMOOD MIRZA, J.

Relies on Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Lahore v. Saima Azad (1996 SCMR 676) to contend that the learned Judges of the High Court were not right in summoning the examiner along with the Answer Books. Leave to appeal is granted to examine this contention. Meanwhile, operation of the impugned order shall remain suspended. A.A./B-313/SC Leave granted

Legal Tools

Metadata Directory

  • Journal: SCMR
  • Volume Year: 1998
  • Citation Ref: 1998 PLP 114 (SCMR)

Cite & Link (Backlink Generator)

Are you writing a blog or referencing this case? Copy the optimized HTML link below to cite this judgment on your website and create a legal backlink:

HTML Backlink Code:
Text Citation:

Related Judgments

  • 1998 S C M R 964 WALI MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus DUR MUHAMMAD and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents
  • 1998 S C M R 959 Messrs GHAZI VEGETABLES GHEE AND OIL MILLS LTD. ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Messrs TEMPLAN ORVY SLOTTSGT NORWAY and others‑‑‑Respondents
  • 1998 S C M R 956 KHUDAI RAHIM ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus ABDUL SATTAR and 6 others‑‑‑Respondents
  • 1998 S C M R 954 ABDULLAH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. ABIDA and another‑‑‑Respondents
  • 1998SCMR948 IRSHAD AHMED and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus ALLAH DITTA and others‑‑‑Respondents
  • 1998 S C M R 945 TARIQ AKHTAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE PLANT PROTECTION ADVISER AND DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PLANT PROTECTION, KARACHI and others‑‑‑Respondents