2001 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD NAZIR — Petitioner Versus THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PESHAWAR and 4
| Citation | 2001 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Peshawar |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD NAZIR — Petitioner Versus THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PESHAWAR and 4 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD NAZIR — Petitioner Versus THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PESHAWAR and 4). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Akhtar Naveed for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 491
Detenus were the employees of the complainant in a theft case and were detained in his house when the bailiff recovered them from there and produced them in High Court
Nobody had obstructed or resisted while the detenus were brought to High Court-- Detenus had made certain allegations against various police officials for detaining them for some time and torturing them in connection with the alleged theft committed in the house of the complainant
Detenus were set at liberty in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Habeas Corpus Petition No.52 of 2000, decided on 4th September, 2000.
S. 491
Detenus were the employees of the complainant in a theft case and were detained in his house when the bailiff recovered them from there and produced them in High Court
Nobody had obstructed or resisted while the detenus were brought to High Court-- Detenus had made certain allegations against various police officials for detaining them for some time and torturing them in connection with the alleged theft committed in the house of the complainant
Detenus were set at liberty in circumstances. Akhtar Naveed for Petitioner. Imtiaz Ali, A.A.G. for the State. Date of hearing: 4th September, 2000. The allegations of the petitioner that Muhammad Khurshid Baz Karam were illegally detained by the police. However, today it was revealed that both the detenus are employees with Bashir Ahmad Bilour, Haroon Bilour and when the Bailiff was sent to his house, he brought them before the Court. The Bailiff has stated that no one obstructed or resisted while he was bringing/asking the alleged detenus to accompany him to the High Court. The alleged detenus have narrated certain facts and made certain allegations against the various police officials and detaining them for some time and also torturing them in connection with the alleged theft case committed in the house of Bashir Ahmad Bilour. Since the alleged detenus have been produced by the Bailiff and have come to the High Court from the house of Bashir Ahmad Bilour and both the detenus as well as the Bailiff have stated that no one obstructed or resisted their bringing to the High Court. Both the detenus, Muhammad Khurshid and Baz Karam are now before the Court and are at liberty to go anywhere where they want. Both the applications are disposed of accordingly. N.H.Q./199/P Petition allowed.