2008 PLP 1448 (CLC)
Syed BAQAR RAZA — Petitioner Versus Mst. SHAHINDA BAQAR and 2 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2008 PLP 1448 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Syed BAQAR RAZA — Petitioner Versus Mst. SHAHINDA BAQAR and 2 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 1448 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 1448 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 1448 (CLC) (Syed BAQAR RAZA — Petitioner Versus Mst. SHAHINDA BAQAR and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ms. Kousar Amin for Jamil Ahmed Virk for Petitioner.
- Ms. Talat Aslam for Respondent.
- MUHAMMAD MOOSA K. LEGHARI, J.--- In the early morning Mr. Jamil Ahmed Virk, Advocate for the petitioner, left a chit that he was busy before a Division Bench of this Court. The matter is called thrice since morning. It is now 1-20 p.m. but the Advocate for the petitioner is said to be on his legs before other Bench.
- Learned counsel for the respondent stated that because of interim order passed in favour of the petitioner, the Advocate for the petitioner is avoiding to appear. The perusal of the previous diaries reveals that the matter, was adjourned on the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner. In the circumstances interim orders passed in the matter are recalled.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Counsel of petitioner, on the day of hearing had left a chit that he was busy before a Division Bench
Matter was called thrice since morning, and upto 1.20 p.m. counsel of the petitioner had failed to appear
Contention of the respondent was that because of interim orders passed in favour of the petitioner, his counsel was avoiding to appear
Previous diaries revealed that the matter was adjourned on the request of the counsel of the petitioner
High Court, in circumstances, recalled the interim order passed in the matter.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD MOOSA K. LEGHARI, J.
In the early morning Mr. Jamil Ahmed Virk, Advocate for the petitioner, left a chit that he was busy before a Division Bench of this Court. The matter is called thrice since morning. It is now 1-20 p.m. but the Advocate for the petitioner is said to be on his legs before other Bench. Learned counsel for the respondent stated that because of interim order passed in favour of the petitioner, the Advocate for the petitioner is avoiding to appear. The perusal of the previous diaries reveals that the matter, was adjourned on the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner. In the circumstances interim orders passed in the matter are recalled. M.B.A./B-36/K Petition dismissed.