1986 PLP 1512 (SCMR)
REHMAT and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1512 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ |
| Parties | REHMAT and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1512 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1512 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1512 (SCMR) (REHMAT and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Aftab Farrukh, Advocate Supreme Court and Sh. Masood Akhtar, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners (in Criminal Petition No. 229 of 1983).
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Nemat Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner (in Criminal Petition No. 230 of 1983).
- Date of hearing: 27th May, 1986.
- Aftab Farrukh, Advocate Supreme Court and Sh. Masood Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners (in Criminal Petition No. 229 of 1983).
- Nemat Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in Criminal Petition No. 230 of 1983).
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 10-4-1983, passed in Criminal Appeals Nos. 758 and 750 of 1980).
Art. 185(3)--Petition for leave to appeal--Accused unable to make out good ground for interference--Petitions dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑This order will dispose of: (i) Criminal Petition No. 229 of 1983. (ii) Criminal Petition No. 230 of 1983 filed by Rehmat etc. and Haji Allah Ditta, respectively, against the enhancement of their sentence; (iii) Jail Petition No. 71‑R of 1983; and (iv) Jail Petition No. 58‑R of 1983; filed by Allah Rakha and Muhammad Hussain, against their conviction and sentences.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties in Criminal Petition No. 229 of 1983 and 230 of 1983. Learned counsel for the petitioner in Criminal Petition No. 229 of 1983 withdrew the petition on instructions from his client. Mr. Nemat Khan, counsel for the petitioner in Criminal Petition No. 230 of 1983 has not been able to make out any good ground for interference by this Court. The said petitions are therefore, dismissed.
3. We have also gone through the two Jail Petitions mentioned above and find no mere in the same. Consequently these are also dismissed. This disposes of the four petitions. M . Y . H . Petitions dismissed.