2008 PLP 130 (CLC)
Dr. Syed HASSAN ALI through Attorney — Plaintiff Versus IMAMIA DARUL UFTA AND SHARIAT BOARD EDARAE TABLEAGUE ULOOM MUHAMMAD AND ALE MUHAMMAD TRUST Registered through Chairman and 2 others — Defendants
| Citation | 2008 PLP 130 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Dr. Syed HASSAN ALI through Attorney — Plaintiff Versus IMAMIA DARUL UFTA AND SHARIAT BOARD EDARAE TABLEAGUE ULOOM MUHAMMAD AND ALE MUHAMMAD TRUST Registered through Chairman and 2 others — Defendants |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 130 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 130 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 130 (CLC) (Dr. Syed HASSAN ALI through Attorney — Plaintiff Versus IMAMIA DARUL UFTA AND SHARIAT BOARD EDARAE TABLEAGUE ULOOM MUHAMMAD AND ALE MUHAMMAD TRUST Registered through Chairman and 2 others — Defendants). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- GULZAR AHMED, J.----Plaintiff's counsel at the outset has pointed out through Certificate No.0858, dated 13-12-2006 that he was enrolled as an Advocate of this Court by the Sindh Bar Council. He has attached photocopy of such certificate along with his Vakalatnama filed on 17-11-2006. The plaintiff counsel also filed a Tasdiqnama, dated 15-8-2006 issued by the Nazim Union Council No.6, North Nazimabad Town, Karachi declaring Talaq given by the plaintiff to Tazeen Zehra daughter of Syed Ali Hasnain Naqvi to have become effective. The counsel for the defendants make a categorical statement that in view of the certificate issued by the Union Council, the defendants do not press their letters complained of by the plaintiff and accept the dissolution of marriage between the plaintiff and Tazeen Zehra. Plaintiff's counsel is satisfied with such statement of the defendant's counsel and does not press this suit. The suit is therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. The listed applications are also dismissed on the above terms.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 5 & Schedule
Suit for dissolution of marriage
Plaintiff had filed a Tasdiqnama issued by the Nazim Union Council declaring-Talaq given by the plaintiff to the daughter of defendant to have become effective
Counsel for defendants made statement that in view of certificate issued by the Union Council, defendants would not press their case and they would accept the dissolution of marriage between the plaintiff and daughter of defendant
Plaintiff's counsel being satisfied with such statement of defendant's counsel, did not press the suit
Suit was dismissed as withdrawn.
Judgment & Decree
GULZAR AHMED, J.
Plaintiff's counsel at the outset has pointed out through Certificate No.0858, dated 13-12-2006 that he was enrolled as an Advocate of this Court by the Sindh Bar Council. He has attached photocopy of such certificate along with his Vakalatnama filed on 17-11-2006. The plaintiff counsel also filed a Tasdiqnama, dated 15-8-2006 issued by the Nazim Union Council No.6, North Nazimabad Town, Karachi declaring Talaq given by the plaintiff to Tazeen Zehra daughter of Syed Ali Hasnain Naqvi to have become effective. The counsel for the defendants make a categorical statement that in view of the certificate issued by the Union Council, the defendants do not press their letters complained of by the plaintiff and accept the dissolution of marriage between the plaintiff and Tazeen Zehra. Plaintiff's counsel is satisfied with such statement of the defendant's counsel and does not press this suit. The suit is therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. The listed applications are also dismissed on the above terms. H.B.T./H-27/K Suit dismissed.