1996 P Cr (PLP)
PHULL PIR SHAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1996 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | PHULL PIR SHAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1996 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1996 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1996 P Cr (PLP) (PHULL PIR SHAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ch. Riasat Ali and Sh. Naveed Shehryar for Petitioner
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S., 324/337/148/149
Bail, grant of-- Case of accused was quite similar with case of co-accused who had been granted bail by the Court
Accused remained in jail for about one year and trial had not concluded
Accused, in circumstances, was also entitled to concession of bail.
Judgment & Decree
S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S., 324/337/148/149
Bail, grant of-- Case of accused was quite similar with case of co-accused who had been granted bail by the Court
Accused remained in jail for about one year and trial had not concluded
Accused, in circumstances, was also entitled to concession of bail. Ch. Riasat Ali and Sh. Naveed Shehryar for Petitioner Masood Sadiq Mirza for the State. Date of hearing: 18th October, 1994. The petitioner Phull Pir Shah, has applied for bail in case F:1.R. No.236 registered on 26-6-1993 under sections 324/337-F(i)(iv)(v)/337-D/ 148/149 and 109, P.P.C. at Police Station, Sadar, Mandi Bahauddin. This case was registered on the statement of Ghulam Abbas and six accused were named. It was alleged that all the accused armed with fire-arms attacked the complainant party at 7.00 a.m. near graveyard. Khizer Hayat and Faiz received fire-arm injuries. The petitioner was alleged to have fired at Faiz hitting
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that co-accused Khizer Hayat and Umar Hayat were granted bail by my learned brother Mian Abdul Khaliq, J., on 2-4-1994 (Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1029-B of 1994). The petitioner remained in jail for about one year and trial has not concluded. Learned counsel submitted that the case of the petitioner is quite similar with the case of co-accused who have been granted bail by this Court.
3. I have perused the record and I am of the view that the petitioner should also be granted the concession of bail in circumstances of the case., I, therefore, direct that the petitioner be released on bail provided he furnishes two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000 each to the satisfaction of trial- Magistrate/A.C., Mandi Bahauddin. H.B.T./P-120/L Bail granted