1977 P Cr (PLP)
INAYAT HUSSAIN-Petitioner Versus Ch. AKRAM AND 7 OTHERS — Respondents
| Citation | 1977 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | INAYAT HUSSAIN-Petitioner Versus Ch. AKRAM AND 7 OTHERS — Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1977 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1977 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1977 P Cr (PLP) (INAYAT HUSSAIN-Petitioner Versus Ch. AKRAM AND 7 OTHERS — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Hussain for Petitioner.
- Q. M. Salim for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 491-flabeas corpus-Detenus, including two men, two women and five children, deposing to have been wrongly confined by res pondents-Respondents contending that alleged detenus and petitioner received advances to work at their brick-kiln petition filled to escape their pecuniary liability-Respondents, held, having no right to deny liberty to detenus, under an assertion of pecuniary obligation Datenus set at liberty. [Habeas corpus].
Judgment & Decree
In compliance with the orders of this Court the detenus including two men, two women and five children have been produced. The detenus have stated before me teat the respondents had wrongly confined them and do not wish to reside at the place from where they have been recovered. Respondents Ch. Akram and Ch. Ahsan have stated that they have lent advances to the petitioner and the detenus. Learned counsel for the respondents contends that the petitioner as well as the detenus to escape the pecuniary liability has filed this petition. If the respondents have any monetary claim against the detenus or the petitioner, they are free to have recourse to law. However, under an assertion of pecuniary obliga tion, the respondents have no right to deny the liberty of the detenus. The detenus are act at liberty. They are free. Rule is made absolute. Petition allowed.