SCMR 1989

1989SCMR1415(2) (PLP)

ABDUL WAHEED Petitioner Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Petition No.286 of 1983, decided on 2nd August, 1988.
Honorable Judges
Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989SCMR1415(2) (PLP)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Parties ABDUL WAHEED Petitioner Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Primary Law Civil service‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989SCMR1415(2) (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Civil service‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989SCMR1415(2) (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989SCMR1415(2) (PLP) (ABDUL WAHEED Petitioner Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB LOCAL GOVERNMENT). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Civil service‑

Representation

  • Ch. Mushtaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondent.
  • Date of hearing; 2nd August, 1988.

Headnotes / Summary

(From the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 15‑1‑1983 passed in Appeal No.19/968 of 1981). ‑‑‑ Stoppage of increments with cumulative effect is not permissible.

Judgment & Decree

GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑Abdul Waheed, Officiating Assistant Municipal Engineer, Lahore Municipal Corporation, Lahore, seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 15‑1‑83 whereby his appeal against the order dated 27‑11‑80 passed by the respondent relating to stoppage of his three increments with cumulative effect, was dismissed. However, the Tribunal made a little variation that no increment can be stopped with cumulative effect. Stoppage of three increments was considered without cumulative effect. This relief was in accordance with law. Hence we don't think that the order of the Tribunal is contrary to law. Therefore, the petition for special leave to appeal filed by Abdul Waheed against the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal is dismissed. M.B.A./A‑475/S Petition dismissed.