MLD 1989

1989 PLP 1177 (MLD)

BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, STATE OF BIHAR and others — Appellants Versus BAN BIHARI MAHATO and others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided Date
Civil Appeals Nos.1005-6 of 19K1 (arising out of SLP (C) Nos.10341 and 10015 of 1987), decided on 21st March. 1988.
Honorable Judges
Sabvasachi Mukharji and S.Ranganathan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 PLP 1177 (MLD)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of India
Bench Members Sabvasachi Mukharji and S.Ranganathan, JJ
Parties BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, STATE OF BIHAR and others — Appellants Versus BAN BIHARI MAHATO and others — Respondents
Primary Law Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1177 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1177 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of India bench comprising: Sabvasachi Mukharji and S.Ranganathan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1177 (MLD) (BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, STATE OF BIHAR and others — Appellants Versus BAN BIHARI MAHATO and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894)

Headnotes / Summary

S.23--Compensation--Determination of--Findings of High Court set aside having regard to public interest involved and facts and circumstances of the case- Acquisition upheld subject to certain conditions.

Judgment & Decree

Special leave granted and the appeals arc disposed of hereunder.

2. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of these cases in respect of the entire land involved in both the appeals we are setting aside the findings of the High Court without deciding the legality of the question determined by the High Court and having regard to the facts and circumstances of these cases and in view of the public interest involved, in our opinion, the appropriate order would be to uphold the acquisitions made already subject to the following conditions: (1)That the compensation for the said acquisitions should be paid as if the acquisitions were made as on 1-3-19W (2)Such compensation to be determined by the Land Acquisition Collector in accordance with law within a period of six months from this date. (3)After determining such compensation, subject to any legal objections if any, the compensation should be paid to the respondents within three months thereafter.

3. The respondents will make their claims and the parties will appear on 16. 1-1988 before the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Adityapur Industrial Area Development Authority, Adityapur (Jamshedpur). 4.The appeals are disposed of accordingly. M.B.A./32/FCOrder accordingly.