1986 PLP 1599 (SCMR)
SHAH MUHAMMAD — Appellant Versus DEWANA and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1599 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Abdul Qadir Shaikh. S.A. Nusrat and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ |
| Parties | SHAH MUHAMMAD — Appellant Versus DEWANA and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Supreme Court Rules, 1980 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1599 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Supreme Court Rules, 1980 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1599 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Abdul Qadir Shaikh. S.A. Nusrat and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1599 (SCMR) (SHAH MUHAMMAD — Appellant Versus DEWANA and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ---O. XV, Rr. 1 & 4--Non-prosecution of appeal--Appeal before Supreme Court--None appearing for appellant--Dispute reported to have been settled out of Court--Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
- Nemo for Appellant.
- Basharatullah, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Yaqoob K. Eusufzai, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 26th April, 1986.
- Basharatullah, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Yaqoob K. Eusufzai, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Baluchistan High Court, Quetta, dated 27th October, 1977 in Petition No. 113 of 1976).
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑O. XV, Rr. 1 & 4‑‑Non‑prosecution of appeal‑‑Appeal before Supreme Court‑‑None appearing for appellant‑‑Dispute reported to have been settled out of Court‑‑Appeal dismissed for non‑prosecution with no order as to costs. Nemo for Appellant. Basharatullah, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Yaqoob K. Eusufzai, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents. Date of hearing: 26th April, 1986. ABDUL QADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑Neither the appellant nor any one on , his behalf has cared to attend. According to learned counsel for the respondents the dispute in the case has been settled outside the Court. The appeal is however, dismissed for non‑prosecution, with no order as to costs. M I. Order accordingly.