1986 P Cr (PLP)
Syed MUHAMMAD IKRAM alias MUHAMMAD AKRAM‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1986 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Syed MUHAMMAD IKRAM alias MUHAMMAD AKRAM‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P Cr (PLP) (Syed MUHAMMAD IKRAM alias MUHAMMAD AKRAM‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- M. Salim Sehgal for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497‑‑Customs Act (1V of 1969). 5.163‑‑Articles intended to be used for preparation of forged documents having been recovered by customs raiding party from a house‑‑House from where recovery was made, not being in exclusive occupation of accused‑‑Accused admitted to bail in circumstances of case.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 15‑B/C of 1984, decided on 4th July, 1984
S. 497‑‑Customs Act (1V of 1969). 5.163‑‑Articles intended to be used for preparation of forged documents having been recovered by customs raiding party from a house‑‑House from where recovery was made, not being in exclusive occupation of accused‑‑Accused admitted to bail in circumstances of case. M. Salim Sehgal for Petitioner. Maqbool Ahmad II for the State. The allegations against the petitioner are that on 23‑5‑1984 a raiding party organized by the Customs Department recovered 125 blank forms 'A' blank passports, two rubber stamps, stencils and stencil- holders. These forms and articles were intended to prepare forged documents for the illegal import of goods into Pakistan. It appears from the F.I.R. that the house from where the recovery was made was rot exclusively in the occupation of the petitioner. Let the petitioner be admitted to bail on his executing a bond in the sum of Rs.25,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Special Judge (Customs), Lahore. S.A. Bail granted.