2006 PLP 1202 (YLR)
ATTAULLAH and another — Appellants/Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 PLP 1202 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Mian Muhammad Najam-uz-Zaman, J |
| Parties | ATTAULLAH and another — Appellants/Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 1202 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 1202 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Mian Muhammad Najam-uz-Zaman, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 1202 (YLR) (ATTAULLAH and another — Appellants/Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Ameer Khan Niazi for Petitioners.
- Date of hearing: 27th April, 2005.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302, 34 & 109
No allegation existed against accused with regard to causing injury to deceased
Only role attributed to accused was that of making ineffective firing at the relevant time
During investigation nothing was recovered from accused persons and both of them had been declared innocent-Names of both accused persons had been placed in Column No.2 of the challan
Accused were admitted to bail, in circumstances. Qazi Zafar Iqbal for the State.
Judgment & Decree
MIAN MUHAMMAD NAJAM -UZ-ZAMAN, J.
Seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.182, dated 5-12-2004 for the offence under sections 302/34/109, P.P.C. registered at Police Station, Gunjial, District Khushab.
2. The allegation against the petitioners is that on 5-12-2004 at about 2-00 p.m. both of them being armed with fire-arms along with co-accused in furtherance of their common intention committed the murder of Mst. Sughran Bibi deceased. The precise allegation against the petitioners is that they made ineffective firing at the relevant time. During the investigation petitioners were arrested on 6-1-2005. The bail application of the petitioners was dismissed by the Sessions Judge, Khushab vide .order dated 7-4-2005. Hence this petition.
3. Heard. File perused.
4. Admittedly there is no allegation against the petitioners with regard to causing injury to the deceased. The only role attributed to the petitioners is that of making ineffective firing at the relevant time. During the investigation nothing was recovered from the petitioners and both of them have been declared innocent. The names of both the petitioners had been placed in Colunm No.2 of the challan. Accordingly, this petition is allowed, petitioners are admitted to bail provided they furnish bail bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (one lac) each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Deputy Registrar (Judi.) of this Bench. H.B.T./A-406/L Bail granted.