2010 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Dr. MEHMOOD AHMED Versus SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT and others
| Citation | 2010 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Tassaduq Hussain Jillani and Sayed Zahid Hussain, JJ |
| Parties | Dr. MEHMOOD AHMED Versus SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT and others |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Tassaduq Hussain Jillani and Sayed Zahid Hussain, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Dr. MEHMOOD AHMED Versus SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Dr. Ehsan-ul-Haque Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal against the order, dated 6-7-2009 passed by Lahore High Court, Lahore in I.C.A. No.562 of 2009).
Art. 185(3)
Grant of allowance
Leave was granted, inter alia, to consider whether, having served as Medical Officer for more than three decades and in absence of the requirement of M.B., B. S. as qualification could the petitioner be refused the Health Sector Reforms Allowance.
Judgment & Decree
Inter alia contends that the Secretary, Local Government, has incorrectly interpreted the Notification Bearing No.PO(P&E-I)19-113/2004(III) dated 28-6-2006 vide which the Medical Officers posted in rural areas were granted Health Sector Reforms Allowance by holding that the minimum qualification requisite for the said allowance is M.B.,B.S. Adds that petitioner has to his credit 32 years of service as Assistant Medical Officer and Medical Officer in Rural Sector of Punjab and was fully qualified to get the allowance in question. Having heard petitioner's learned counsel and having gone through the impugned judgment, leave is granted, inter alia, to consider whether having served as Medical Officer for more than three decades and in absence of the requirement of M.B.,B.S. as qualification, could the petitioner be refused the afore-mentioned allowance? H.B.T ./M-130/SC Leave granted.