CLC 1981

1981 PLP 755 (CLC)

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB KHAN Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN‑‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Azad J & K
Decided Date
Writ Petition No. 46 of 1978, decided on 9th May, 1981.
Honorable Judges
Sardar Muhammad Sharif Khan, Actg. C J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1981 PLP 755 (CLC)
Forum / Court Azad J & K
Bench Members Sardar Muhammad Sharif Khan, Actg. C J
Parties MUHAMMAD YAQOOB KHAN Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN‑‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 755 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 755 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Azad J & K bench comprising: Sardar Muhammad Sharif Khan, Actg. C J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 755 (CLC) (MUHAMMAD YAQOOB KHAN Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

Representation

  • Sh. Abdul Aziz for Petitioner.
  • Muhammad Saddique Farooqi for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑ Art. 199‑WritAffidavit filed by petitioner stating petitioner having had no knowledge of impugned allotment till he went in appeal before Rehabilitation Authority ‑‑ Found patently false ‑ Rehabilitation Authority being lawful authority, dealing matter as warranted by law, and there appearing no legal flaw in impugned order so as to attract writ jurisdiction, petition dismissed. Date of institution : 28th October, 1978.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN‑‑‑Respondent Writ Petition No. 46 of 1978, decided on 9th May, 1981. ‑‑‑ Art. 199‑WritAffidavit filed by petitioner stating petitioner having had no knowledge of impugned allotment till he went in appeal before Rehabilitation Authority ‑‑ Found patently false ‑ Rehabilitation Authority being lawful authority, dealing matter as warranted by law, and there appearing no legal flaw in impugned order so as to attract writ jurisdiction, petition dismissed. Sh. Abdul Aziz for Petitioner. Muhammad Saddique Farooqi for Respondent. Date of institution : 28th October, 1978.