PCRLJ 1990

1990 P Cr (PLP)

SARDAR alias SARDARA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
26th May 1980
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1990 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties SARDAR alias SARDARA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 P Cr (PLP) (SARDAR alias SARDARA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Rao Hamid Mukhtar Khan for Petitioner

Headnotes / Summary

S. 426

Suspension of sentence

Quarrel between parties started over cutting of branches of trees

Convict, a shepherd, alleged to be armed with Kulhari, inflicted a solitary blow resulting in death of deceased

Facts of case showing lack of `mens rea' on part of convict

Sentence of convict suspended in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

S. 426

Suspension of sentence

Quarrel between parties started over cutting of branches of trees

Convict, a shepherd, alleged to be armed with Kulhari, inflicted a solitary blow resulting in death of deceased

Facts of case showing lack of `mens rea' on part of convict

Sentence of convict suspended in circumstances. Rao Hamid Mukhtar Khan for Petitioner Nemo for the State For the purpose of suspension of sentence, learned counsel contended, that the quarrel started over the cutting of branches of trees. The petitioner, a' shepherd, was alleged to be armed with Kulhari, he inflicted a solitary biow which resulted in the death of Muhammad Siddique. Learned counsel submitted that this fact shows lack of `mens rea' on the part of the petitioner. The submission is not without force, hence the sentence of the petitioner' is suspended subject to his furnishing security in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Gujranwala. H.B.T./S-613/L Sentence suspended.