1972 PLP 165 (PLC)
MUHAMMAD BASHIR Versus MANAGEMENT OF SUTLEJ COTTON MILLS., OKARA
| Citation | 1972 PLP 165 (PLC) |
| Forum / Court | Punjab Labour Court |
| Bench Members | Mahmood Ahmad Soofi, Chairman |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD BASHIR Versus MANAGEMENT OF SUTLEJ COTTON MILLS., OKARA |
| Primary Law | DECISION, Court or other authority" |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1972 PLP 165 (PLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: DECISION, Court or other authority" as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1972 PLP 165 (PLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Punjab Labour Court bench comprising: Mahmood Ahmad Soofi, Chairman.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1972 PLP 165 (PLC) (MUHAMMAD BASHIR Versus MANAGEMENT OF SUTLEJ COTTON MILLS., OKARA). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Ss. 34 & 37(4)‑Dismissal of application under S. 34 due to non‑appear ance of petitioner or his authorised representative‑Order of Labour Court final under S. 37(4) and not appealable. Mr. Abdul Majid Qureshi who claimed to be the representative of the petitioner when he appeared in this Court on the 18th of December 1970, is not present in the Court today despite repeated calls. The petitioner is also absent from this Court today without any reasonable cause although a notice was sent to him for appearing in this Court today. It is already 2‑45 p.m. today and I can see no reason for waiting any longer for either the petitioner or Mr. Abdul Majid Qureshi. The latter has not filed any special power of attorney on judicial paper bearing the signature of the petitioner. 'For all the above recorded reasons, especially the absence of the petitioner himself without any reasonable cause, this application (under section 34 of the industrial' Relations Ordinance, 1969) is dismissed. In view of the provisions of subsection 4 of section 37 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, this deci sion of the Labour Court, Central Zone, Lahore, "shall be final and shall not be called in question in any manner by or before any'
Judgment & Decree
MANAGEMENT OF SUTLEJ COTTON MILLS., OKARA Application No. 383 of '1970 decided on 14th January 197,
1. Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Ss. 34 & 37(4)‑Dismissal of application under S. 34 due to non‑appear ance of petitioner or his authorised representative‑Order of Labour Court final under S. 37(4) and not appealable. Mr. Abdul Majid Qureshi who claimed to be the representative of the petitioner when he appeared in this Court on the 18th of December 1970, is not present in the Court today despite repeated calls. The petitioner is also absent from this Court today without any reasonable cause although a notice was sent to him for appearing in this Court today. It is already 2‑45 p.m. today and I can see no reason for waiting any longer for either the petitioner or Mr. Abdul Majid Qureshi. The latter has not filed any special power of attorney on judicial paper bearing the signature of the petitioner. 'For all the above recorded reasons, especially the absence of the petitioner himself without any reasonable cause, this application (under section 34 of the industrial' Relations Ordinance, 1969) is dismissed. In view of the provisions of subsection 4 of section 37 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, this deci sion of the Labour Court, Central Zone, Lahore, "shall be final and shall not be called in question in any manner by or before any'