1994 P Cr (PLP)
WADERO GHULAM HYDER and 3 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | WADERO GHULAM HYDER and 3 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (WADERO GHULAM HYDER and 3 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- The four applicants are present is Court today with their Advocate Mr. Farid Ahmed Dayo. He contends that the applicants are accused of offences under section 353, 332, 342, 147, 149, 504 and 186, P.P.C. All these offences are bailable. In spite of the offences being bailable the applicants) apprehend that they will be arrested by Jhirak Police.
- Mr. Habib Rasheed, Advocate appearing for the Advocate-General, Sindh, agrees to the contentions advanced by Mr. Farid Ahmed Dayo, B Advocate for the applicants, and records his no objection to the grant of bail.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.353/332/342/147/149/504/186-- Pre-arrest bail, grant of
Despite the offence being bailable the accused apprehended their arrest by the police
Prosecution had no objection to the grant of bail to the accused
Pre-arrest: bail was granted to the accused in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.353/332/342/147/149/504/186-- Pre-arrest bail, grant of
Despite the offence being bailable the accused apprehended their arrest by the police
Prosecution had no objection to the grant of bail to the accused
Pre-arrest: bail was granted to the accused in circumstances. Farid Ahmed Dayo for Applicants. Habib Rasheed for A.-G. for the State. The four applicants are present is Court today with their Advocate Mr. Farid Ahmed Dayo. He contends that the applicants are accused of offences under section 353, 332, 342, 147, 149, 504 and 186, P.P.C. All these offences are bailable. In spite of the offences being bailable the applicants) apprehend that they will be arrested by Jhirak Police. Mr. Habib Rasheed, Advocate appearing for the Advocate-General, Sindh, agrees to the contentions advanced by Mr. Farid Ahmed Dayo, B Advocate for the applicants, and records his no objection to the grant of bail. The applicants shall not be arrested by police in the investigation of Crime No.42 of 1993 registered at Police Station Jhirak, District Thatta, on their furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand only) each and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Nazir of this Court. If at any time the prosecution considers that there is some evidence implicating the applicants in some non-bailable offences, they can move the trial Court for cancellation of their bail. N.H.Q./G-370/K Pre-arrest bail granted.