2001 P Cr (PLP)
SULTAN alias BABLI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE SUTE ‑‑‑ Respondent
| Citation | 2001 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Asif Jan, J |
| Parties | SULTAN alias BABLI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE SUTE ‑‑‑ Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Asif Jan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 P Cr (PLP) (SULTAN alias BABLI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE SUTE ‑‑‑ Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Abdul Latif Chaudhary for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.337‑F(i)(iii)(vi)/337‑L(ii)/147 & 149‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Delay of four days in lodging the F.I.R. for which no explanation was given‑‑‑Offences allegedly committed by the accused did not fall within the prohibition contained in subsection (1) of S.497, Cr.P.C.‑‑ Grant of bail in such cases was the rule and refusal was an exception‑‑ Accused was granted bail, in circumstances. Tariq Bashir v. The State PLD 1995 SC 34 ref. S.A. Irshad for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Abdul Latif Chaudhary for Petitioner. S.A. Irshad for the State. Sultan alias Babli petitioner aged about 20 years, was arrested on the 14th of August, 2000 and is in jail eversince awaiting his trial in pursuance of a case registered against him arid five others vide F.I.R. No.213 of 2000, dated the 19th of July, 2000, under sections 337‑F(i)/(iii)/(vi)/337‑L(ii)/ 147 and 149, P.P.C. at Police Station Sadar, District Sargodha, regarding an occurrence which allegedly took‑place on the 15th of July, 2000 at 6‑30 p.m. in the area of Chak No.88 which is at a distance of about nine kilometres from Police Station Saddar, District Sargodha, where the F.I.R. was lodged after four days on the 19th of July, 2000 by Zafar Iqbal, an uncle of Umar Draz who was caused injury by the accused person.
2. The allegation against Sultan alias Babli petitioner is that he was armed with Sota with which he caused an injury on the right calf of Umar Draz.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there is a delay ‑of four days in lodging the F.I.R. and that the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner does not fall within the prohibition contained in subsection (1) of section 497, Cr.P.C. and, therefore, the petitioner is entitled to the grant of bail.
4. Learned counsel for the State submits that the challan has been submitted; that the petitioner is nominated in the F.I.R. and specific role has been assigned to him and, therefore, is not entitled to the grant of bail.
5. Admittedly, there is a delay of four days in lodging the F.I.R. for which there is no explanation and which tends to cast a doubt on the veracity of the prosecution case. Be that as it may, the offences allegedly committed by the petitioner do not fall within the prohibition contained in subsection (1) of section 497, Cr.P.C. and the grant of bail in such cases is the rule and refusal is an exception as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Tariq Bashir v. The State reported in PLD 1995 SC 34.
6. Resultantly, this petition is accepted and Sultan alias Babli petitioner is granted bail provided he furnishes bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./146/S‑L Bail granted.