Home Maxims & Terms Accused was granted bail meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Accused was granted bail

Accused was granted bail legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PCrLJ 274 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S. 514Forfeiture of surety bondAbsence of mitigating circumstancesEffectAccused was granted bailApplicant stood surety for the accusedAccused absented himself from date of hearingBond executed by surety was forfeited in its entirety and notice under S.514, Cr.P.C. was issued

Contentions of the surety that notice under S.514, Cr.P.C. was never served upon him, and that no lenient view was taken by the court and entire surety amount had been forfeited

Validity

Report regarding serving of notice revealed that the Trial Court had issued a notice under S. 514, Cr.P.C. and same was served upon the surety

Trial Court had adopted the procedure as provided under S.514, Cr.P.C.

Surety had not brought forward any mitigating circumstances to adopt a lenient view

Revision petition was dismissed with the observation that approach of the Trial Court appeared to be dynamic and progressive-orientated with the desire to discourage the accused persons from jumping bail bonds.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Accused was granted bail", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939614

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Accused was granted bail"

PCRLJ 2004
2004-July-12

2004 P Cr

ALI MURAD — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
YLR 2001
Criminal Bail Application No.8 of 2001, decided on 26th March, 2001.

2001 Y L R 202

MUHAMMAD AZEEM‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 2014
2013-October-22

2014 M L D 486

IRFAN YAQOOB — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PCRLJ 1994
25thJanuary, 1994

1994 P Cr

MUHAMMAD ANWAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2004
N/A

2004P3063

N/A

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1995
1994-October-24

1995 P Cr

SHAHADAT ALI alias SHAHADAT — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2002
Criminal Miscellaneous No.4513/B of 2001, decided on 3rd October, 2001.

2002 Y L R 948

SAJJAD AHMED ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2004
Criminal Bail Application No.391 of 2003, decided on 8th August, 2003.

2004 Y L R 201

DARYA KHAN‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 1995
4th September 1994

1995 M L D 98

MUGHULBAZ — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 2001
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6430‑B of 2000, decided on 28th November, 2000.

2001 M L D 1686

MUNAWAR HUSSAIN and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore