1995 P Cr (PLP)
SHAHADAT ALI alias SHAHADAT — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1995 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SHAHADAT ALI alias SHAHADAT — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 P Cr (PLP) (SHAHADAT ALI alias SHAHADAT — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.12
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.377
Accused was less than 16 years of age and was entitled to concession of bail
Question of enmity between the parties could be gone into at the time of trial
Prosecution had no objection if the accused was granted bail on merits
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
S. 497
Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.12
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.377
Accused was less than 16 years of age and was entitled to concession of bail
Question of enmity between the parties could be gone into at the time of trial
Prosecution had no objection if the accused was granted bail on merits
Accused was allowed bail in circumstances. Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Petitioner. Sikandar Tariq for the State. The petitioner is involved in case F.I.R. No.32g, dated 20-7-199.1 under section 12 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Police Station Noor Shah, District Sahiwal for committing sedum) with one Muhammad Parvaiz. Bail application of the petitioner was rejected by order, dated 25-9-1994 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sahiwal on the ground that there is no enmity between the complainant and the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon para 5 of the order refusing bail, to show that admittedly, the age of the petitioner is less than 16 years. He has cited case-law in support of his proposition that in such a situation the petition is entitled to concession of bail. He further submits that question of enmity will be gone into at the time of trial. Learned State counsel has no objection if on the facts of the case the petitioner is granted bail. In view of above the petitioner is granted bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Sahiwal. N.H.Q./S-535/L Bail granted.