1995 PLP 98 (MLD)
MUGHULBAZ — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1995 PLP 98 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUGHULBAZ — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 PLP 98 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 PLP 98 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 PLP 98 (MLD) (MUGHULBAZ — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S.497
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art.3/4-- Bail, grant of
Charas weighing 40,008 grams was allegedly recovered from the secret drawer under the body of the truck being driven by accused
Accused had remained in jail for more than seven months and the trial had not yet commenced
Accused was granted bail in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
S.497
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art.3/4-- Bail, grant of
Charas weighing 40,008 grams was allegedly recovered from the secret drawer under the body of the truck being driven by accused
Accused had remained in jail for more than seven months and the trial had not yet commenced
Accused was granted bail in circumstances. 1988 PCr.LJ 369 ref. Jai Jai Veshno for Applicant. Zawar Hussain Jaffri, A.A.-G. for the State The applicant is facing trial under Article 3/4, Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order before the learned City Magistrate, Shikarpur on the allegation that 40,008 grams of Charas was recovered from the secret drawer under the body of the truck being driven by him. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that in spite of information received earlier by the concerned officials, about the truck even they have failed to associate independent person to act as Mashir of recovery. Learned counsel further contends that the applicant is poor driver and has remained in jail for more than 7 months, and the trial has not yet commenced. Learned counsel has placed his reliance on 1988 PCr.LJ
369. Learned A.A.-G. has opposed the application. Without going into the merits of the case, since the petitioner has remained in jail for a considerable period and the trial has not yet commenced, E the petitioner is granted bail in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. N.H.Q./M-1991/K Bail granted.