2002 PLP 948 (YLR)
SAJJAD AHMED ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2002 PLP 948 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Ramday, J |
| Parties | SAJJAD AHMED ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 948 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 948 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Ramday, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 948 (YLR) (SAJJAD AHMED ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Irfan Malik for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Accused, in initial investigation had been found innocent‑‑ Successor S.H.O. found accused guilty and submitted challan, but S.D.P.O. while verifying said investigation, did not agree with the S.H.O and declared the accused innocent‑‑‑Similar was opinion of Range Crime Branch and the Provincial Crime Branch‑‑‑Accused was granted bail, in circumstances. Mazhar Sajjad Sheikh for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Accused, in initial investigation had been found innocent‑‑ Successor S.H.O. found accused guilty and submitted challan, but S.D.P.O. while verifying said investigation, did not agree with the S.H.O and declared the accused innocent‑‑‑Similar was opinion of Range Crime Branch and the Provincial Crime Branch‑‑‑Accused was granted bail, in circumstances. Muhammad Irfan Malik for Petitioner. Mazhar Sajjad Sheikh for the State. In the initial investigation, the petitioner had been found innocent. The next S.H.O. however, found him guilty, and submitted a challan but the S.D.P.O. while verifying this investigation did not agree with the S.H.O. and declared that the petitioner was innocent. Similar was the opinion of the Range Crimes Branch and such is also the opinion of the Provincial Crime Branch.
2. In this view the matter, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in case F.I.R. No.534 dated 8‑10‑2000 of Police Station, Kunjah of District Gujrat subject to his furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.