1994 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD ANWAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ANWAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD ANWAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- R.A. Awan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 379/411/440/109
Bail, grant of-- Accused was in jail for the, last about three months
Investigation was complete and accused was no longer required by police
Challan had been submitted in the Court
Co-accused were on bail
Accused was granted bail in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 379/411/440/109
Bail, grant of-- Accused was in jail for the, last about three months
Investigation was complete and accused was no longer required by police
Challan had been submitted in the Court
Co-accused were on bail
Accused was granted bail in circumstances. R.A. Awan for Petitioner. Date of hearing: 25th January, 1994. This is bail application on behalf of petitioner Muhammad Anwar who is involved in case F.I.R. No. 190/93, dated 3-7-1993 under section 379/411/ 440/109; P.P.C. registered with Police Station Pasrur, District Sialkot.
2. The Police Officer states that petitioner was arrested on 1-11-1993 and that he has completed the investigation and the challan has already been filed before the competent Court. It is further stated by him that the co-accused have already been granted bail.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there was no legal justification for the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sialkot to reject the bail of the petitioner vide his order, dated 10-11-1993. He further submits that the petitioner is no longer required by the police and this fact is certified by the Police Officer who has no objection if the petitioner is granted bail.
4. In view of the above, the petitioner is granted bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C., Sialkot. The petitioner is directed to appear before the trial Court on each date of hearing. N.H.Q./M-1480/L Bail granted.