2001 PLP 1686 (MLD)
MUNAWAR HUSSAIN and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2001 PLP 1686 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J |
| Parties | MUNAWAR HUSSAIN and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 1686 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 1686 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 1686 (MLD) (MUNAWAR HUSSAIN and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Anwar‑ul‑Haq Pannu for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10/11‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Alleged abductee had made statement before the Investigating Officer outside the Court that she had entered into marriage with elder brother of the accused of her free‑will and that nobody had committed Zina with her and also that she was residing with her sister- in‑law‑‑‑Case of further inquiry having been made out accused was granted bail. Akhtar Ali Manga for the State,
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6430‑B of 2000, decided on 28th November, 2000. ‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10/11‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Alleged abductee had made statement before the Investigating Officer outside the Court that she had entered into marriage with elder brother of the accused of her free‑will and that nobody had committed Zina with her and also that she was residing with her sister- in‑law‑‑‑Case of further inquiry having been made out accused was granted bail. Ch. Anwar‑ul‑Haq Pannu for Petitioners. Akhtar Ali Manga for the State, This is a second bail petition on behalf of petitioners. Earlier Bail Petition No.5918/B of 2000 was dismissed by me on merits on 25‑10‑2000 and detailed facts have already been given in the abovesaid bail petition.
2. Mst. Naseem Akhtar the alleged abductee has made a statement before the Investigating Officer outside the Court today, in which she has stated that she has entered into marriage with Masroor elder brother of Manawar Husain petitioner No. l according to her free‑will. She also stated that nobody committed Zina with her and presently she is residing with her sister‑in‑law. In this view of the matter a case of further inquiry is made out. This petition is accepted. Petitioners are allowed bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 (fifty thousand) each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. H.B.T./M‑616/L Bail granted.