1994 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD DIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD DIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD DIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Aftab Ahmad Bajwa for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/324/34
Bail, grant of-- Accused was empty-handed at the time of occurrence
Accused was not stated to have assaulted any one and was only accused of proverbial Lalkara
Accused was neither a previous convict nor a hardened criminal and was no longer required by police
Judgment & Decree
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/324/34
Bail, grant of-- Accused was empty-handed at the time of occurrence
Accused was not stated to have assaulted any one and was only accused of proverbial Lalkara
Accused was neither a previous convict nor a hardened criminal and was no longer required by police
Accused was allowed bail in circumstances. Aftab Ahmad Bajwa for Petitioner. Latif Ayyaz for the State. Date of hearing: 5th December, 1993. The petitioner is accused of offence under sections 302, 324/34, P.P.C. vide F.I.R. No. 386, dated 28-8-1993, registered at Police Station Cantt. Sialkot.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the State were heard at length in respect of the contentions raised herein. Admittedly, the petitioner was empty handed at the time of the alleged occurrence and is only accused of proverbial Lalkara and is not specifically accused of having A assaulted any one. Furthermore, the petitioner is in the judicial lock-up and is no longer required by the police and he is neither a previous convict nor a hardened criminal.
3. Therefore, the petitioner is hereby allowed bail in the sum of B Rs.50,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty Magistrate, Ssalkot. N.H.Q./M-1415/L Bail allowed.