1987 PLP 1129 (MLD)
ALI SHER — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1129 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Afrasiab Khan, J |
| Parties | ALI SHER — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1129 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1129 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Afrasiab Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1129 (MLD) (ALI SHER — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Q. M . Salim for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860) S. 302/34--Bai1, grant of- Co-accused, attributed similar allegations as were attributed to accused, who was granted bail--Accused also admitted to bail. Farrukh Humayun for the State.
Judgment & Decree
S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860) S. 302/34--Bai1, grant of- Co-accused, attributed similar allegations as were attributed to accused, who was granted bail--Accused also admitted to bail. Q. M . Salim for Petitioner. Farrukh Humayun for the State. The petitioner Ali Sher moved this petition for bail after arrest under section 497, Cr.P.C. in a case registered against him under section 302/34, P.P.C. at police station Pir Mahal, District Toba Tek Singh vide F.I.R.No.42/87 dated 10-3-1987. 2. It is argued that the only allegation against' the petitioner is that he held the deceased by her legs. It is next argued that there are no marks of injuries found on the legs of the deceased. Lastly it is submitted that the co-accused .Zafar under similar circumstances was allowed bail by this Court vide order dated 25-7-1987 in Cr.M. No.2385/B-87. Learned counsel appearing for the State submitted that in the above-referred case, the co-accused Zafar was found innocent by the Investigating Officer, whereas in the case in hand the petitioner has been found guilty by the police. Be that as it may, the fact remains that similar allegations were attributed to the petitioner Ali Sher as well as Zafar. The co-accused Zafar has been admitted to bail by this Court and as such, the present petitioner is also admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.50,000.(Rupees fifty thousand) with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/D,uty Magistrate, Toba Tek Singh. M.Y.H/A-167/L Bail granted