1994 PLP 1663 (SCMR)
Sheikh SARFRAZ AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, MULTAN AND BAHAWALPUR DIVISIONS and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1994 PLP 1663 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Shafiur Rahman and Saleem Akhtar, JJ |
| Parties | Sheikh SARFRAZ AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, MULTAN AND BAHAWALPUR DIVISIONS and others‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 1663 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 1663 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Shafiur Rahman and Saleem Akhtar, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 1663 (SCMR) (Sheikh SARFRAZ AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, MULTAN AND BAHAWALPUR DIVISIONS and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- A.R. Shaukat, Senior Advocate, Sheikh Abdul Aziz, Advocate and Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 23rd November, 1993.
Headnotes / Summary
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Art.188‑‑‑Supreme Court Rules, 1980, OXXVI, R.1‑‑‑Review.of Supreme Court judgment‑‑‑Seeking demarcation of property through review‑‑ Validity‑‑‑Review was sought for sole reason that it might not prove to be an impediment in seeking demarcation of property transferred by Settlement Authority‑‑‑Such ground was not a valid ground for review‑‑‑Judgment sought to be reviewed had dealt with a limited controversy viz. of restitution‑‑‑No ground for review was made out‑‑‑Re view petition dismissed in circumstances. ORDER SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.‑‑‑Review of our judgment dated 23‑6‑1993 is sought for the sole reason that it may not prove to be an impediment in seeking demarcation of the property transferred by Settlement Authorities. This cannot be a valid ground for review. Besides, the impugned judgment has dealt with a limited controversy viz., of restitution. No ground for review is made out. Dismissed. AA./S‑794/S Review dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.‑‑‑Review of our judgment dated 23‑6‑1993 is sought for the sole reason that it may not prove to be an impediment in seeking demarcation of the property transferred by Settlement Authorities. This cannot be a valid ground for review. Besides, the impugned judgment has dealt with a limited controversy viz., of restitution. No ground for review is made out. Dismissed. AA./S‑794/S Review dismissed.