PCRLJ 1968

1968 P Cr (PLP)

AHMAD KHAN AND 3 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court
Decided Date
6th December 1967
Honorable Judges
A. R. Cornelius, C. J. and Muhammad Yaqub Ali, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1968 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Supreme Court
Bench Members A. R. Cornelius, C. J. and Muhammad Yaqub Ali, J
Parties AHMAD KHAN AND 3 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court bench comprising: A. R. Cornelius, C. J. and Muhammad Yaqub Ali, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1968 P Cr (PLP) (AHMAD KHAN AND 3 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Niaz Muhammad Siddiqi, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Wajid Hussain, Senior Attorney for Petitioners.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 325/34‑Grievous hurtAccused convicted and sentenced to one year's R. I‑Special leave to appeal to Supreme Court sought against quantum of sentencePlea raised not supported by provision of law or some precedent‑Petition dismissed.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.‑The petitioners stand convicted under section 325/34, P. P. C. and sentenced to one year's rigorous imprisonment each. Leave is asked for to appeal on the ground that since the case was in the first instance heard by a Second Class Magistrate who could impose a maximum sentence of six months, the subsequent conviction and award of sentence of one year's rigorous imprison ment by a First Class Magistrate was illegal. The learned counsel is unable to support the plea raised by any provision of the Code or by some precedent. The sentence awarded being legal and fully merited by the merciless blows given by the petitioners to the complainant which resulted in the fracture of both his legs we see no ground to interfere. The petition is dismissed.