1998 PLP 2360 (SCMR)
UNION COUNCIL, DANDOT through Chairman‑‑‑Petitioner Versus NATIONAL CEMENT INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., DANDOT through Works Manager and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1998 PLP 2360 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Munir Khan and Mir Hazar Khan Khoso, JJ |
| Parties | UNION COUNCIL, DANDOT through Chairman‑‑‑Petitioner Versus NATIONAL CEMENT INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., DANDOT through Works Manager and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Punjab Local Councils (Octroi) Rules, 1964‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1998 PLP 2360 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Local Councils (Octroi) Rules, 1964‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1998 PLP 2360 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan and Mir Hazar Khan Khoso, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1998 PLP 2360 (SCMR) (UNION COUNCIL, DANDOT through Chairman‑‑‑Petitioner Versus NATIONAL CEMENT INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., DANDOT through Works Manager and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Munir Peracha, Advocate instructed by Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 12th July, 1995.
- Muhammad Munir Peracha, Advocate instructed by Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order of Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi dated 26‑4‑1995 passed in Writ Petition No.652 of 1994). ‑‑‑‑R. 35‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Imposition of surcharge on respondent's products‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider whether Union Council was legally competent to impose surcharge by its Notification on various items used in cement factory of respondent at various rates per ton.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD MUNIR KHAN, J.
We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Leave to appeal is granted to consider whether the petitioner/Union` Council, Dandot was legally competent to impose surcharge vide Notification dated 20-5-1992 on various items used in the Cement Factory at various rates, per ton.
3. The interim relief granted on 24-5-1995 shall continue till the disposal of appeal A.A./U-7/S Leave granted.