1984 PLP 58(1) (SCMR)
KHAN BAHADAR — Petitioner Versus BARKAT AHMAD AND OTHERS-Respondents
| Citation | 1984 PLP 58(1) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ |
| Parties | KHAN BAHADAR — Petitioner Versus BARKAT AHMAD AND OTHERS-Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 58(1) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 58(1) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 58(1) (SCMR) (KHAN BAHADAR — Petitioner Versus BARKAT AHMAD AND OTHERS-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nazir Ahmad Shami, Advocate Supreme Court and Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing : 13th March, 1983.
- Nazir Ahmad Shami, Advocate Supreme Court and Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- We have gone through the impugned judgment and heard the learned Advocate‑on‑Record for the petitioner because the learned counsel has not, cared to appear. He has good reason for not appearing because the petition is on the face of it is a frivolous one and ought not to have been filed. it is consequently dismissed.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated 10th February 1981 in W. P. 134/81).
Art. 185 (3)-Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 517 Leave to appeal sought against order of High Court dismissing petitioner's writ petition against order of Superdari passed by Sessions Judge in criminal matter pending before said Sessions Judge-Petition being on face of it a frivolous one which ought not to have been filed, dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the order of the High Court, dated 10‑2‑1981, dismissing his writ petition against an order of Superdari passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in criminal matter pending before him. We have gone through the impugned judgment and heard the learned Advocate‑on‑Record for the petitioner because the learned counsel has not, cared to appear. He has good reason for not appearing because the petition is on the face of it is a frivolous one and ought not to have been filed. it is consequently dismissed. M. Z. M. Petition dismissed.