PLC(CS) 1980

1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

MRS. M. J. B. SHAH Versus SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF SIND, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

Jurisdiction / Court
Service Tribunal Sind
Decided Date
Appeal No. 40 of 1979, decided on 20th June 1979.
Honorable Judges
Ghulam Rasool Shaikh, Chairman, Abdul Kadir and G. A. Mughal, Members
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Service Tribunal Sind
Bench Members Ghulam Rasool Shaikh, Chairman, Abdul Kadir and G. A. Mughal, Members
Parties MRS. M. J. B. SHAH Versus SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF SIND, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Primary Law Sind Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Sind Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Sind bench comprising: Ghulam Rasool Shaikh, Chairman, Abdul Kadir and G. A. Mughal, Members.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (MRS. M. J. B. SHAH Versus SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF SIND, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Sind Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973)‑

Representation

  • A. A. Shah for Appellant.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 4‑‑Persons affected not impleaded‑‑Appeal not admitted for hearing and dismissed summarily.

Judgment & Decree

Appeal No. 40 of 1979, decided on 20th June 1979.

S. 4‑‑Persons affected not impleaded‑‑Appeal not admitted for hearing and dismissed summarily. A. A. Shah for Appellant. GHULAM RASOOL SHAIKH (CHAIRMAN).‑‑The relief sought pertains to promotion or appointment to selection grade. Not only this but this is based on the seniority against three persons who have not been impleaded. So apart from the fact the question of promotion cannot be agitated before this Tribunal the appeal suffer from non‑pleading of persons likely to be affected. Appeal is summarily dismissed. Appeal dismissed.