1989 PLP 4163 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD AMIN and 4 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 4163 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Javid Iqbal and Rustam S. Sidhwa, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD AMIN and 4 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 4163 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 4163 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Javid Iqbal and Rustam S. Sidhwa, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 4163 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD AMIN and 4 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S .561‑A‑‑Re‑calling of Court's order on the plea that full fats were not placed before Court‑‑Order suspending sentence passed by Court‑‑Court cannot indirectly review its own order under S. 561‑A, Cr.P.C.‑‑[Review]. Muzaffar Qadir for Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
JAVID IQBAL, J.‑--This is an application for recalling the order passed on 13th October, 1980 by a D.B consisting of myself and A. Rehman, J. whereunder Javed Iqbal, Shaukat and Liaquat respondents were allowed bail and their sentence was suspended. It is contended by the learned counsel that he has filed this petition on behalf of the complainant under section 561‑A, Cr.P.C. and that this Court has power to recall its own order. It is further contended that full facts had not been placed before this Court when passing the order dated, 13-10-1980. We have pointed out to learned counsel that if he has any grievance against the said order, he should challenge the same in appeal before the Supreme Court as under section 561‑A, Cr. P.C. this Court could not indirectly review its own order. This being, the position, the application is dismissed. S.A./M‑1449/L Petition dismissed.