CLC 1990

1990 PLP 807 (CLC)

ANJUMAN‑E‑ISLAMIA PAKISTAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary,

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Constitutional Petition No.D‑199 of 1988, heard on 7th February, 1989.
Honorable Judges
Saleem Akhtar and lrnmn Ali Kazi, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1990 PLP 807 (CLC)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Saleem Akhtar and lrnmn Ali Kazi, JJ
Parties ANJUMAN‑E‑ISLAMIA PAKISTAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary,
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 807 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 807 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Saleem Akhtar and lrnmn Ali Kazi, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 807 (CLC) (ANJUMAN‑E‑ISLAMIA PAKISTAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑

Representation

  • S.M. Abbas for Petitioner.
  • A.A. Muhammadally A.A.‑C). Sindh for Respondent.
  • Date of hearing: 7th February, 1989.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑Handing over of Educational Institution to owners‑‑‑Petitioner mainly relying upon news items published in certain newspapers circulating news that Martial Law Authorities passed orders to hand over schools to owners‑‑‑Assistant Director, School Education, making statement that no such orders from any Authority had been received for release of petitioner's school‑‑‑Mere news item could hardly be made basis for filing petition and in absence of any order alleged to have been passed, it could not be implemented‑‑‑Petition was dismissed.

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑Handing over of Educational Institution to owners‑‑‑Petitioner mainly relying upon news items published in certain newspapers circulating news that Martial Law Authorities passed orders to hand over schools to owners‑‑‑Assistant Director, School Education, making statement that no such orders from any Authority had been received for release of petitioner's school‑‑‑Mere news item could hardly be made basis for filing petition and in absence of any order alleged to have been passed, it could not be implemented‑‑‑Petition was dismissed. S.M. Abbas for Petitioner. A.A. Muhammadally A.A.‑C). Sindh for Respondent. Date of hearing: 7th February, 1989. SALEEM AKHTAR, J.‑‑The petitioner Society was running several schools and institutions amongst which one of them was Anjuman‑e‑Islamia Secondary School. All these Schools were taken over by the Government under Martial Law Regulation No.118. It has been alleged in the Petition that on representation being made, in August, 1977, the petitioner learnt that Martial Law Authorities have released the said School to the petitioner and have passed necessary order. It has further been alleged that in spite of the order passed by the Martial Law Authorities, the respondents have refused to hand over the school to the petitioner. No copy of the order alleged to have been passed by the Martial Law Authorities has been produced. Mr. Hamid Ali Oureshi, Assistant Director School Education Department, Government of Sindh is present and on our query he has made a statement that no order from any authority has been received by the respondents for release of the school to the petitioner. The petitioner has mainly relied upon news item published in certain newspapers which circulated the news of the order passed by the Martial law Administrator. Such news items could hardly be made basis for a petition as the present one. In the absence of any order alleged to have been passed, it is difficult to implement the same. We, therefore, see no force in the petition which is dismissed with no order as to the costs. M.Y.H./A‑626/K Petition dismissed