PLC 2017

2017 PLP 73 (PLC)

D.S. PAKISTAN RAILWAYS Versus Mst. S. YASMEEN and others

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore High Court
Decided Date
Intra-Court Appeal No.1278 of 2016, decided on 11th January, 2017.
Honorable Judges
Ayesha A. Malik and Jawad Hassan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2017 PLP 73 (PLC)
Forum / Court Lahore High Court
Bench Members Ayesha A. Malik and Jawad Hassan, JJ
Parties D.S. PAKISTAN RAILWAYS Versus Mst. S. YASMEEN and others
Primary Law (b) Workmen's Compensation Act (VIII of 1923), (a) Industrial dispute
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2017 PLP 73 (PLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: (b) Workmen's Compensation Act (VIII of 1923), (a) Industrial dispute as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2017 PLP 73 (PLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Ayesha A. Malik and Jawad Hassan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2017 PLP 73 (PLC) (D.S. PAKISTAN RAILWAYS Versus Mst. S. YASMEEN and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(b) Workmen's Compensation Act (VIII of 1923) (a) Industrial dispute

Representation

  • Muhammad Saeed Tahir Sulehri for Appellant.

Headnotes / Summary

Pensionary benefits

Wife of deceased employee filed constitutional petition for grant of pensionary benefits which was accepted holding that disciplinary proceedings could be initiated against an employee for his non-performance or ill-performance of duties who was alive and in the service of organization/department

Validity

Employee-husband of petitioner died prior to initiation of disciplinary proceedings

Disciplinary proceedings had abated and no order could have been passed against the deceased employee

No illegality had been pointed out in the impugned judgment passed by the Single Judge of High Court

Intra court appeal was dismissed in circumstances.

Preamble

Scope

Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 had been promulgated to compensate an employee who had been injured during the course of his employment.