P L D 1997 Peshawar 53 (PLP)
MADAD KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | P L D 1997 Peshawar 53 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | Sardar Muhammad Raza, J |
| Parties | MADAD KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1997 Peshawar 53 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1997 Peshawar 53 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Sardar Muhammad Raza, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1997 Peshawar 53 (PLP) (MADAD KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Attaullah Tangi for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 15th November, 1995.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324 & 34‑‑‑Bail, grant of ‑‑‑F.I.R. indicated the victim to have been injured by a fire shot whereas the injury sustained by him according to his medico‑legal report was a grazed wound‑‑ Medical Officer after having shown the kind of weapon used as "blunt" had subsequently changed the same in his report into a "fire‑arm '‑‑‑Trial Court was yet to determine if the injury had been caused to the victim by a fire‑arm or by any other blunt means and by whom‑‑‑Accused were released on bail in circumstances. Akhtar Naveed for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Madad Khan and Ghaniur Rehman, having been refused bail by the forums below have come up to this Court. They are charged under section 324/34, P.P.C. with reference to F.I.R. 625, dated 13‑9‑1995 of Police Station Tangi. 2.The F.I.R. indicates that the victim was injured by a fire shot whereas in the madico‑legal report it is mentioned to be a grazed wound. The doctor had first shown the kind of weapon as blunt which he intersected and subsequently changed it by fire‑an‑n. In the circumstances, it is yet to be proved at trial as to whether it was an injury caused by fire‑arm or by any other blunt means and also as to which one of the accused had caused the same or if both had the common intention.
3. Till it is so determined, the petitioners Madad Khan and Ghaniur Rehman are directed to be released on bail provided they furnish bail bond in a sum of Rs.40,000 with two local, reliable and resourceful sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Ilaqa Magistrate alone. N.H.Q./1962/P Bail granted.