2004 PLP 1566 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD ARIF BASHIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2004 PLP 1566 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ARIF BASHIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 PLP 1566 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 PLP 1566 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 PLP 1566 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD ARIF BASHIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Zahid Husain Khan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 337-A(ii)/337-F(i)/ 3791452/148/149
During occurrence, accused had also received injuries and he was got medically examined by police
Question as to which party was aggressor, needed further inquiry
Police finding showed that at the time of occurrence, accused was empty-handed and at the most case against accused was covered under S. 452, P.P.C.
All the co-accused had already been admitted to bail
Ad interim pre-arrest bail already granted to accused, stood confirmed, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Seeks pre-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.190 of 2002, dated 5-9-2002 under sections 337-A(ii)/337-F(i)/379/148/149/452, P.P.C. Registered at Police Station Renala Khurd, District Okara.
2. The said F.I.R. Was got registered by brother of the petitioner but during the investigation on the basis of counter-version which was recorded on 14-9-2002 i.e., nine days after the registration of this case, the petitioner has also been arraigned as accused with the specific allegation that at the time of occurrence he was armed with hockey and gave injuries to one Zulfiqar.
3. It is a case of two versions. During this occurrence petitioner also received injuries and he was got medically examined by the police. Under the circumstances of this case the question as to which party was aggressor needs further inquiry and brings the case of the petitioner within the fold of section 497(2), Cr.P.C. Even otherwise according to the police finding at the time of occurrence petitioner was empty-handed A and at the most case against him is covered under section 452, P.P.C. Similarly all the accused mentioned in the F.I.R. Have already been admitted to bail. In this view of the matter, ad interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the petitioner stands confirmed against the same surety bonds. H.B.T./M-591/L Interim pre-arrest bail confirmed.