MLD 1987

1987 PLP 2276 (MLD)

RAZIA NAUSHIN — Petitioner Versus NIKAH REGISTRAR and others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Writ Petition No.4679 of 1986, decided on 21st October, 1986.
Honorable Judges
Manzoor Hussain Sial, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1987 PLP 2276 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Manzoor Hussain Sial, J
Parties RAZIA NAUSHIN — Petitioner Versus NIKAH REGISTRAR and others — Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 2276 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 2276 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Manzoor Hussain Sial, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 2276 (MLD) (RAZIA NAUSHIN — Petitioner Versus NIKAH REGISTRAR and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • M.Farani, Bar-at-Law for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)--.

S.5--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199--Registration of marriage--Invocation of constitutional remedy--Constitutional petition disposed of by High Court with observation that if petitioner submits Parat Nikah alongwith receipt showing that he had paid requisite registration fee, Nikah Registrar would act strictly in accordance with law.

Judgment & Decree

Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)--.

S.5--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199--Registration of marriage--Invocation of constitutional remedy--Constitutional petition disposed of by High Court with observation that if petitioner submits Parat Nikah alongwith receipt showing that he had paid requisite registration fee, Nikah Registrar would act strictly in accordance with law. M.Farani, Bar-at-Law for Petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has not paid the requisite registration fee and sent a receipt accompanying the Parat Nikah to the Nikah Registrar, respondent No.1, for registration. 2. The petitioner if resubmits Parat Nikah alongwith the receipt showing that he had paid the requisite registration fee, respondent No.1 who is Nikah Registrar shall act strictly in accordance with law. Subject to the observation made above, this petition stands disposed of. A. A./R-41/L Petition disposed of.