1993 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
SARFRAZ ARSHAD KHAN, (DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE), PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO. 8, BAHAWALPUR Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB AND PUNJAB CIVIL SECRETARIAT, LAHORE and others
| Citation | 1993 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Sh. Khizar Hayat, J |
| Parties | SARFRAZ ARSHAD KHAN, (DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE), PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO. 8, BAHAWALPUR Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB AND PUNJAB CIVIL SECRETARIAT, LAHORE and others |
| Primary Law | Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Ordinance (XII of 1991) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Ordinance (XII of 1991) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Sh. Khizar Hayat, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (SARFRAZ ARSHAD KHAN, (DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE), PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO. 8, BAHAWALPUR Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB AND PUNJAB CIVIL SECRETARIAT, LAHORE and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Shamsher Iqbal Chughtai for Petitioner.
- Shaheen Masood Rizvi, Asstt. A.‑G. (on call) for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 7th December, 1992.
- 2. Learned Assistant Advocate‑General who appeared on call of the Court, has objected to the maintainability of this petition as it involves matter relating to the terms and conditions of service which falls within exclusive jurisdiction of the Tribunal constituted under section 3 of the Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Ordinance (XII of 1991). The objection is upheld and this petition is therefore dismissed as being not maintainable.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 3‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑‑Secretariat allowance‑‑ Entitlement to‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑Maintainability of‑‑‑Petitioner in his Constitutional petition had prayed that he being Presiding Officer of Labour Court was entitled to draw Secretariat Allowance as allowed by Government through Notification‑‑‑Matter involved in petition related to terms and conditions of service which fell within exclusive jurisdiction of Tribunal constituted under S. 3 of Ordinance, 1991‑‑‑Constitutional petition was dismissed as being not maintainable.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S. 3‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑‑Secretariat allowance‑‑ Entitlement to‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑Maintainability of‑‑‑Petitioner in his Constitutional petition had prayed that he being Presiding Officer of Labour Court was entitled to draw Secretariat Allowance as allowed by Government through Notification‑‑‑Matter involved in petition related to terms and conditions of service which fell within exclusive jurisdiction of Tribunal constituted under S. 3 of Ordinance, 1991‑‑‑Constitutional petition was dismissed as being not maintainable. Shamsher Iqbal Chughtai for Petitioner. Shaheen Masood Rizvi, Asstt. A.‑G. (on call) for Respondents. Date of hearing: 7th December, 1992. Through filing this writ petition it is prayed that the petitioner on account of having been attached to the Labour Department as Presiding Officer of Labour Court, Bahawalpur, is entitled to draw Secretariat Allowance as allowed vide Notification dated 8‑8‑1988, issued by Government of the Punjab, and Notification, dated 1‑7‑1988, issued by the Federal Government.
2. Learned Assistant Advocate‑General who appeared on call of the Court, has objected to the maintainability of this petition as it involves matter relating to the terms and conditions of service which falls within exclusive jurisdiction of the Tribunal constituted under section 3 of the Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Ordinance (XII of 1991). The objection is upheld and this petition is therefore dismissed as being not maintainable. H.B.T./S‑320/L Petition dismissed.