2007 PLP 9 (YLR)
SAJJAD alias SAKKOO — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 9 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Nazir Ahmad Siddiqui, J |
| Parties | SAJJAD alias SAKKOO — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 9 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 9 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Nazir Ahmad Siddiqui, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 9 (YLR) (SAJJAD alias SAKKOO — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik M. Jamshaid Awan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.380 & 411
Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss.10 & 16
Delay of two months in lodging F.I.R.
Accused, who was behind the bars for the last three months, was not alleged to have committed Zina with the alleged abductee as was also evident from her statement recorded under S.164, Cr.P.C.
Accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances. Mehr Khalilur Rehman for the Complainant. Nasrullah Khan Kakar for the State.
Judgment & Decree
NAZIR AHMAD SIDDIQUI, J.
Petitioner seeks post-arrest bail in a case . registered vide F.I.R. No.$4 of 2005 dated 12-4-2005 under sections 10 and 16 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance VII of 1979 read with sections 380 and 411, P.P.C. at Police Station, Makhdoom Rasheed District Multan.
2. As per F.I.R., complainant's daughter Mst. Asma has been enticed away by the petitioner along with others for the purpose of committing Zina.
3. Arguments heard. Record perused.
4. There is a delay of two months in lodging the F.I.R.; that the petitioner who is behind the bars for the last three months, was not alleged to have committed Zina with the alleged abductee as is also evident from her statement recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C.
5. For what has been stated above, instant petition is allowed by admitting the petitioner to bail subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rs. Fifty thousand) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./S-175/L Bail granted.