2007 PLP 2649 (YLR)
GHULAM MUSTAFA — Applicant Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-IV, QUETTA and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2007 PLP 2649 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Quetta |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Nadir Khan, J |
| Parties | GHULAM MUSTAFA — Applicant Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-IV, QUETTA and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 2649 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 2649 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Quetta bench comprising: Muhammad Nadir Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 2649 (YLR) (GHULAM MUSTAFA — Applicant Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-IV, QUETTA and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 516-A & 517
Application for return of documents submitted by surety for release of his vehicle
Vehicle of applicant which was stolen, subsequently was recovered
F.I.R. with regard to said incident though was registered, but no challan had been submitted and case had been consigned to record after recovery of vehicle
State counsel expressed hrs no objection with regard to return of documents of said vehicle, which were submitted by surety for release of vehicle
Property documents submitted by the surety for release of vehicle were returned to him. Muhammad Shabir Rajput for Applicant. Sardar Munir Ahmed Durrani for the State.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD NADIR KHAN, J.
This application has been submitted for the return of property document/Fard submitted by Lal Muhammad for release of the vehicle of applicant, which was stolen on 28-1-1998 and subsequently recovered but accused being unknown could not be arrested. With regard to said incident F.I.R. No.23 of 1998 was registered with Police Station Industrial Area, Quetta but till date no challan has been submitted. However, report has been made that the case has been consigned to record as after recovery of the vehicle the culprits could not be treated out and there is no likelihood of their being traced out in future. The learned State counsel expressed his no objection with regard to return of property documents/Fard submitted by Lal Muhammad for the release of vehicle of the applicant.
2. In such view of the matter the surety so submitted by Lal Muhammad for release of the vehicle of applicant is discharged. The property documents/Fard so .riled by him before the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Quetta be returned to him after due identification of the surety as per law. H.B.T./25/Q Application allowed.