2011 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2011 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Jawwad S. Khawaja, Anwar Zaheer Jamali and Khilji Arif Hussain, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2011 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2011 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Jawwad S. Khawaja, Anwar Zaheer Jamali and Khilji Arif Hussain, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2011 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nemo for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment/order of the Federal Service Tribunal Karachi, dated 12-2-2010 in Appeals Nos.83, 48, 45, 282(K)CE of 2005, 491(K)(CE) of 2004 and 450(K)CE of 2002).
Art. 212(3)
Service Tribunal had failed to take into account that employer organization was very much an entity established and operated by the Federal Government and therefore employees were entitled to invoke the jurisdiction of the Service Tribunal
Leave to appeal was granted to employees to consider the said matter. Petitioners in person (in C.P.L.As. Nos.184-K, 187-K, 190-K and 212-K of 2010).
Judgment & Decree
The petitioners have made submissions in person. It does prima facie, appear that the learned Federal Service Tribunal did not take into account the fact that the National Logistic Cell ('NLC') was very much an entity established and operated by the Federal Government and, therefore, the petitioners, who were employees of NLC, were entitled to invoke the jurisdiction of the Federal Service Tribunal. Leave to appeal is, therefore, granted in these cases to consider the above matter. M.A.K./M-24/SC Leave granted.