2004 PCr (PLP)
NAZIF KHAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2004 PCr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Peshawar |
| Bench Members | Tariq Parvez and Ijaz‑ul‑Hassan Khan, JJ |
| Parties | NAZIF KHAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 PCr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 PCr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: Tariq Parvez and Ijaz‑ul‑Hassan Khan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 PCr (PLP) (NAZIF KHAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Yaqoob Khan Marwat for Appellant.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 13‑‑‑Suppression of Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), S.7‑‑‑Appreciation of evidence‑‑‑Recovery of unlicensed Kalashnikov with live bullets from house of accused during raid to arrest proclaimed offender‑‑‑Witnesses examined by prosecution were all police officials‑‑‑House of accused was within Village Abadi, but Investigating Officer had not associated any notable of the area during recovery process‑‑‑Not conceivable that if proclaimed offender had escaped on getting information about arrival of police, accused would still keep ‑Kalashnikov in his possession instead of either concealing same in house by disarming himself or by trying to escape‑‑‑House of accused was occupied by other inhabitants‑‑‑Conviction and sentence awarded to accused were set aside giving him benefit of doubt and he was acquitted of the charge. Salimullah Ramzai for the State. Date of 19th December, 2003.
Judgment & Decree
THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent Criminal Appeal No.79 of 2003, decided on 19th December, 2003. ‑‑‑‑S. 13‑‑‑Suppression of Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), S.7‑‑‑Appreciation of evidence‑‑‑Recovery of unlicensed Kalashnikov with live bullets from house of accused during raid to arrest proclaimed offender‑‑‑Witnesses examined by prosecution were all police officials‑‑‑House of accused was within Village Abadi, but Investigating Officer had not associated any notable of the area during recovery process‑‑‑Not conceivable that if proclaimed offender had escaped on getting information about arrival of police, accused would still keep ‑Kalashnikov in his possession instead of either concealing same in house by disarming himself or by trying to escape‑‑‑House of accused was occupied by other inhabitants‑‑‑Conviction and sentence awarded to accused were set aside giving him benefit of doubt and he was acquitted of the charge. Muhammad Yaqoob Khan Marwat for Appellant. Salimullah Ramzai for the State. Date of 19th December, 2003.