Register
YLR 2007

2007 PLP 2914 (YLR)

ZAFAR IQBAL alias GADRI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No.71/B of 2007, decided on 25th January, 2007.
Honorable Judges
Iqbal Hameedur Rahman, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2007 PLP 2914 (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Iqbal Hameedur Rahman, J
Parties ZAFAR IQBAL alias GADRI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 2914 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 2914 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Iqbal Hameedur Rahman, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 2914 (YLR) (ZAFAR IQBAL alias GADRI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Rana Khalid Mahmood for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Arts.3 & 4

Bail, grant of

Offence against accused did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr. P. C.

Accused had no previous history qua his involvement in such-like activity

Accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances. 2005 MLD 698 and 1999 PCr.LJ 924 rel. Zia Mohy-ud-Din for the State. Muhammad Ashraf, S.-I.

Judgment & Decree

IQBAL HAMEED-UR-REHMAN, J.

Petitioner seeks post-arrest bail in a case F.I.R. No. 243 of 2006 dated 22-9-2006 under sections 3, 4 of Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order IV of 1979 Police Station Katcha Khooh District Khanewal.

2. It is alleged in the F.I.R. the petitioner was indulged in manufacturing/ distilling the liquor.

3. Arguments heard. Record perused.

4. The offence do not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. There is no previous history of the petitioner qua his involvement in such-like activities. Hence, relying on the case reported 2005. MLD 698 and 1999 PCr.LJ 924, I am inclined to allow this petition by admitting the petitioner to post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.5,0,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./Z-7/L??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Bail granted

Legal Tools

Metadata Directory

  • Journal: YLR
  • Volume Year: 2007
  • Citation Ref: 2007 PLP 2914 (YLR)

Cite & Link (Backlink Generator)

Are you writing a blog or referencing this case? Copy the optimized HTML link below to cite this judgment on your website and create a legal backlink:

HTML Backlink Code:
Text Citation:

Related Judgments

  • 2007 Y L R 2649 GHULAM MUSTAFA — Applicant Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-IV, QUETTA and another — Respondents
  • 2007 Y L R 2642 MIRZA KHAN — Petitionez Versus SECRETARY, SERVICES AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
  • 2007 Y L R 2165 Dr. AZIZULLAH SATAKZAI — Petitioner Versus RETURNING OFFICER/PROVINCIAL ELECTION COMMISSIONER BALOCHISTAN and 4 others — Respondents
  • 2007 Y L R 2724 MAQSOOD-UR-REHMAN and anther — Petitioners Versus ABDUL MANAN — Respondent
  • 2007 Y L R 2645 MUHAMMAD SIRAJUL ISLAM — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NIAZUL ISLAM — Respondent
  • 2007 Y L R 2640 NOOR HABIB — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent