2017 PLP 1232 (YLR)
ASSAD ULLAH — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2017 PLP 1232 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court |
| Bench Members | Sahib Khan C.J. and Malik Haq Nawaz, J |
| Parties | ASSAD ULLAH — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2017 PLP 1232 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2017 PLP 1232 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court bench comprising: Sahib Khan C.J. and Malik Haq Nawaz, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2017 PLP 1232 (YLR) (ASSAD ULLAH — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muzafar-ud-Din for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302 & 34
Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Ss.6, 7, 19(7)(8), 21-D & 21-L
Qatl-i-amd, common intention, act of terrorism
No substantial progress had been made towards conclusion of the trial of the case, even after lapse of over 3 years
Speedy and fair trial was an inherent right of accused guaranteed by the Constitution, as well as by Part II of Gilgit-Baltistan (Self-Empowerment and Governance) Order, 2009
Liberty of a person, could not be curtailed, except in accordance with law
Accused was granted bail. Malik Sherbaz, Dy. A.G. for the State.