1985 PLP 100 (MLD)
Mst. JANTAN — Appellant Versus Mst. MARY AM — Respondent
| Citation | 1985 PLP 100 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Ilyas, J |
| Parties | Mst. JANTAN — Appellant Versus Mst. MARY AM — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 PLP 100 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 PLP 100 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Ilyas, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 PLP 100 (MLD) (Mst. JANTAN — Appellant Versus Mst. MARY AM — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Allah Wasaya Malik for Appellant.
- Ch. Muzammal Hussain for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 24th June, 1985.
Headnotes / Summary
S.100--Second appeal--Compromise--Parties jointly stating to have entered into compromise by a deed and praying through miscellaneous application for acceptance of appeal and dismissal of suit brought by respondent--Court confirming compromise on personal appearance of respondent/plaintiff--Judgment and decrees by lower Court set aside and suit dismissed in circumstance.
Judgment & Decree
S.100--Second appeal--Compromise--Parties jointly stating to have entered into compromise by a deed and praying through miscellaneous application for acceptance of appeal and dismissal of suit brought by respondent--Court confirming compromise on personal appearance of respondent/plaintiff--Judgment and decrees by lower Court set aside and suit dismissed in circumstance. Allah Wasaya Malik for Appellant. Ch. Muzammal Hussain for Respondent. Date of hearing: 24th June, 1985. C.M. No.2583-C/85 was jointly made by the parties stating that they had entered into compromise and praying for the acceptance of this appeal and the dismissal of the suit brought by the respondent. The compromise deed was annexed with the said C.M. By order, dated the 27th May, 1985, my learned brother Abdul Waheed, J. directed the respondent to personally appear before this Court today for confirmation of the compromise. Today, she has entered appearance and confirms A the compromise. Her special attorney, Muhammad Afzal, is also here. He as well as learned counsel for the parties too confirm the compromise. In the circumstances, the appeal is accepted, judgments and decrees passed by the learned lower Courts are set aside and the suit brought by the respondent is dismissed with no order as to costs. The C.M. is disposed of. H . A . K Appeal accepted