Register
PCRLJ 1969

1969 P Cr (PLP)

SHER AFZAL AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court
Decided Date
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 80 of 1968, decided; on 20th June 1968.
Honorable Judges
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1969 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Supreme Court
Bench Members Single Bench
Parties SHER AFZAL AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1969 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1969 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court bench comprising: Honorable Judges.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1969 P Cr (PLP) (SHER AFZAL AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Mushtaq Ahmad Khawaja, Senior Attorney for Petitioners.
  • Date of hearing : 20th June 1968.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Peshawar, dated the 29th February 1968, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 70 of 1968). Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

S. 497‑Cancellation of bail by High Court justified‑Special leave to appeal refused by Supreme Court. Nemo for the State.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.‑The petitioners stood charged with, the commission of the serious charges under sections 353, 148 anal 307/149, P. P. C., section 13 of the Arms Ordinance, section 9 of the Opium Act and section 167(81) of the Sea Customs Act for smuggling 81 maunds of opium and other goods. There was a pitched battle between the petitioners and the police force. The trial Magistrate allowed bail to the petitioners, but the High Court on being moved by the State cancelled their bail. On the facts set out in the report under section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the High Court was justified in cancelling the bail granted to the petitioners and we see no reason to grant special leave to appeal in the case. The petition is dismissed. Leave refused.

Legal Tools

Metadata Directory

  • Journal: PCRLJ
  • Volume Year: 1969
  • Citation Ref: 1969 P Cr (PLP)

Cite & Link (Backlink Generator)

Are you writing a blog or referencing this case? Copy the optimized HTML link below to cite this judgment on your website and create a legal backlink:

HTML Backlink Code:
Text Citation:

Related Judgments

  • 1969 P Cr MUHAMMAD SHAFI‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
  • 1969 P Cr SAID AMIR SHAH‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
  • 1969 P Cr DIN MUHAMMAD‑Appellant Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent
  • 1969 P Cr IBRAHIM‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
  • 1969 P Cr SARDAR ALI‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
  • 1969 P Cr LUTFUR RAHMAN AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent