1994 P Cr (PLP)
MANZOOR HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent'
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MANZOOR HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent' |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (MANZOOR HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent'). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ghulam Hussain Malik for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34
Bail, grant of-- Contentions were that ocular account was contradicted by medical evidence, that the motive as set out did not even bear remote nexus with the accused, that all the brothers had been roped in for a fire-arm wound specifically attributed to the principal accused, that co-accused had been released on bail and that the challan having been submitted to the Court accused was no more required by the investigating agency
Said contentions, prima facie, had constituted sufficient grounds for further inquiry into the involvement of accused in the offence
Judgment & Decree
Ghulam Hussain Malik for Petitioner. Akhtar Ali Qureshi for the State. Date of hearing: 14thDecember, 1993. Bail is being sought in the case registered vide F.I.R. No.12 of 1-6-1993 under section 302/34, P.P.C. at Police Station Bhangi Khel, District Mianwali alleging the murder of complainant's father Soorat Khan by revolver shot firing of his son-in-law Mumtaz Hussain co-accused landing on the chest and abdominal region on the exhortation of, clasping around and infliction of a stick blow at the back by the latter's brothers Ijaz Hussain, Mukhtar Hussain and the petitioner respectively at 8-30 a.m. on the eve of Eid-ul-Baqar while the deceased was offering "Faathiah" at his father's grave, pursuant to matrimonial differences of the principal accused over visiting of his wife to the deceased's place.
2. Contending contradiction of the ocular account by the medical evidence viz. non-manifestation of any blunt weapon injury in the deceased's post-mortem report, the set out motive does not even bear remote nexus with the petitioner, false roping in of all the brothers for a fire-arm wound specifically attributed to the principal accused, co-accused Mukhtar Hussain having been released on bail by the Sessions Court petitioner too is entitled to the concession who with the submission of challan is no more required by the investigating agency, which has been opposed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State reiterating the prosecution story.
3. Prima facie the contentions urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner constituted sufficient ground for further enquiring into his involvement in the offence charged, thus is allowed bail upon furnishing bona in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. N.H.Q./M-1500/L Bail allowed.